Skip to main content

Is Efficiency More Valuable than Reality?




Growth requires failures and errors, yet technology is removing these for efficiency and convenience.

Maybe the most important question 21st-century citizens should ask is: “What level of technology do we need to live healthy and balanced lives in this world?”

Why do we need online technology at all? Why do we need smartphones? Why do we need AI?

And, importantly, what price will society pay for these technologies?

Is the price worth whatever benefits these technologies offer?

At this point, the prudent answer would be no, they are not worth the price, because, for one, they aren’t necessary, and two, they are detrimental to our character, development, and individual freedoms.

The main theme for the integration of online automation technologies in business and personal use is efficiency; it will streamline processes, take away mundane tasks, and all without pesky human error.

The problem is, people have a hard time arguing with efficiency, but is it the most important thing in life — doing things faster, better, and easier?

At what point are we going to realize that outsourcing life to robots isn’t progress? Rather, it is taking away our ability to grow, to live in reality; you know, the reality beyond the machines that are only alive because of a finite source of electricity.

The entire construct of the online world is held together by an illusion fueled by electricity. The larger this illusion gets, the more electricity is needed to power it.

Wouldn’t it make sense to use less electricity? Wouldn’t that be progress, considering electricity comes from finite resources, and the process does harm to our environment?

Yet, we are exponentially expanding the scope of online technologies, pretending all the data is being stored in a cloud; when in reality, it is being stored in huge data centers sucking down more energy than any other segment of society. Interesting how this works.

Are we interested in progress or simply being entertained? AI automation gives us more time to be entertained, right? Isn’t that the main purpose, to take away all the time-wasting activities, so we can party and dance on screens to bolster our neurosis?

The entire scope of humanity has come down to progress equaling efficiency. That’s why we need to put chips in our brains, to become cyborgs, because we will be more efficient!

Why will the world be better when we are all more efficient? Oh, yeah, so we can have time to scroll on our screens and worship the self, I remember. We need more time to enhance our self-absorbed neurosis and essentially think and act out our pleasures.

Efficiency and convenience are the two concepts that will be our downfall, isn’t that interesting? Our entire value system is out the window for these two themes of modern society; our freedoms will disappear for these two wonderfully important words.

The modern mantra: “There is nothing more important than being more efficient and having more convenience.”

Because then we will have the time to do things that are really important, like wonder who the hell we are and why we are doing what we are doing in the first place. Oh, wait, that would take self-reflection and critical thinking.

More like, commit sin and worship idols…

Let’s take a moment and simplify this argument. Wouldn’t it be wise to allow humans to think for themselves, to do things for themselves, instead of outsourcing these to automation? I can understand some technology, a modicum of advancement for the sake of providing a better life for more people, yet can’t we discern when this goes too far?

Making mistakes is part of being human; it helps us learn, problem solve, and grow as people. If technology takes that away in the name of efficiency, then people won’t grow, they won’t learn — they’ll be full of information, but devoid of wisdom, experience, and character.

That is another important aspect of making mistakes, forming character; being challenged, failing, and facing difficulties helps reveal what is inside of us, how we deal with hardships. If we can learn to deal with situations and people better when difficulties and failures arise, then we grow character as a person.

It is fairly obvious, as online technology advances and integrates into our lives, people’s characters are getting worse and worse. The younger generations have a crisis of character because they don’t know how to deal with failure, criticism, hardships, and making mistakes. They refuse to be accountable; they are entitled, spoiled, delusional, etc.

And online technology is creating this crisis of character.

But, it’s all worth it for more efficiency and convenience, right?

Well, it seems that’s the prevailing sentiment of folks. We surely will pay a price, and it will be much worse than having to do mundane tasks and dealing with human mistakes in workflow processes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Does the Future Look Like in Ten Years?

Tech will rule nearly everyone all the time. Ten years isn’t a very long period of time, yet with online technology exponentially growing, it is a long time for things to change. Already, look at what we’ve seen change since the smartphones came out in 2010! In just 16 years, our country doesn’t even resemble itself from before. This is the period of time when the Z generation came of age as well, around 2020, which also has changed things drastically. In ten years (2036), the Alpha generation will be 11-26 years old, therefor coming of age. This will change things drastically again, as this generation is the first to never know a world without a smartphone. The online world, smartphones, and smart tech, is ruining people’s character. Social media, social engineering, is ruining people’s values. The younger generations mostly have bad characters and will only get worse as technology becomes even more prevalent (the destruction of the Biblical family by feminism is key for this to happe...

What Would Draining the Swamp Accomplish?

Does humanity have the solutions for the human condition? Most of us would agree that there is a “swamp” in the power structure that needs to be dealt with and removed, yet what would happen if this actually happened? The bigger question is: Can humanity solve the problem of the human condition? The human condition is a modern way of saying we are under the curse of sin and death. We are fallen and naturally disposed for destruction. If we remained fallen without being redeemed by the faith of Jesus Christ, wouldn’t removing the swamp just be a temporary solution? Wouldn’t the swamp just come back and take over power again eventually? This may sound like a black pill perspective to those looking for solutions from humans instead of God, and in truth, it is a fatalistic perspective when it comes to humans being able to solve the problems of fallen humanity. See, if somehow we were able to drain the swamp and remove the bad apples from the power structure, they would simply come back int...

Writing articles on LinkedIn vs. Medium

For those of us who believe our writing is a reflection of our values and a unique expression of our souls, finding the right platform to write on is important. Of course, there are practical aspects we must consider as well, depending on the purpose and reason for the words, etc. In this respect, I want to explore the idea of writing on LinkedIn vs. Medium. For non-robot people who actually take the time to write from their hearts instead of using AI to create some “content.” AI writers may create content, but they are not writers; they are just using words (however manifested) to essentially get attention and make money. Medium is a very clean and user friendly platform for writers, and the possibility of making money there with their partner program sounds great, especially, considering the popularity of the site. Yet, I’ve found through much effort, Medium is simply an illusion for 99% of the writers that find their way there, paying their monthly dues. See, you have to now pay Med...

The Dormant Blog Dilemma

  With the internet changing so rapidly, being stuck in time with an archaic blog and writing to the obscure winds of vacant space within its outdated theme seems to be an exercise in futility at times. Yes, I can syndicate the content to places like Medium, yet what is the point of pointing them back to my blog anyway, and won’t that ruin the chances of the Medium article being indexed if by chance the site thought it worthy? All of these thoughts and more run through the mind of the old blogger. The crux of the issue has always been strategy and the lack thereof. Honestly, the majority of my writing efforts online have been committed to the strategy and technical aspects of blog design, building, and formatting. What a waste to spend the majority of my writing time trying to face the huge and ever-changing learning curve of building a blog and creating an online writing strategy. The importance of having a strategy of some sort is vital, yet in the back of my blogging mind, there...