Skip to main content

Remembering Bubblews and Similar Others



Thinking back to 2014 I remember this exciting website that hit the scene called Bubblews. The theme was atrocious and the type of writing was mostly inane, yet the video game atmosphere and hopes of making cash drew many people into its playful bubble.

It didn’t take me long to catch on to the most exciting money-making endeavor for online writers, although it did seem like I was late to the party considering how rapidly everyone moved up in social status with every view, star (like), and comment being compensated for payment through PayPal.

Bubblews originally hit the scene in beta mode in 2012, which is why I probably felt a bit late coming to the scene in late 2014. They didn’t officially launch until July 16, 2014, according to Business Wire. The founders were 26-year-olds Arvind Dixit and Jason Zuccari who moved to San Francisco to launch the grand idea.

To be fair, this was during an early time with internet adoption, only a couple of years after smartphones became ubiquitous in America. While their UX/UI was amateurish looking, it was friendly enough for millions of people to ride the bubble. For instance, at the time of their start, they had 20 million monthly visitors from over 240 countries.

All content creators had to do was write at least 400 characters (not words) per bubble and stick to their terms of service, which was similar to most writing platforms. Then after their pennies added up, they could cash out at $50 with PayPal.

I remember there were people from all around the world participating with Bubblews; a Yahoo News article (from the day of lift-off) said most of the activity on the site was from the US, Canada, Britain, Brazil, India, and the Philippines. In some of those countries, making $50 writing about whatever and whenever was better than most jobs!

The altruistic aspect of the site might have been lost in the penny-gobbling frenzy, or just not known to most users, including myself, but the founders had the vision to reward users for their social media interaction, rather than not pay them and just mine their data as other major social media sites do. This was a newer concept back then that unfortunately didn’t work too well.

The Business Wire article explained they did plan to monetize the site and take information from the posts themselves to sort of mine the personalities of the users. It was all good as long as they kept the pennies rolling.

That brings me to shortly after I started “working” for the bustling new writing site, the decline and fall of the promising concept. I don’t remember making a payout before they stopped paying; essentially, I wrote many bubbles to reach the threshold to only get stiffed in the end. A small tragedy in my online writing career.

Even more than being stiffed was the sudden end to making Bubblews part of my daily work routine (one less egg in the basket). Writing bubbles was easy and fun as the pennies came rolling in and the mostly insincere interactions were pandered to carefully. I think back and wonder, what kind of gibberish did I write on this site — it may be a good thing for everyone it shut down. Humor aside, there were some refined writers there, it is all about context and perspective.

Reading a review on HubPages from a disappointed Bubblews writer, we learn the site “died” around mid-November 2015. Like most deaths, it was more painful than anyone would have liked, thousands of users being stiffed like me went forth to tell their woeful tales of being ripped off from the massive bubble bust.

Really, from the beginning of the formal founding, everyone wondered when and if it the bubble would burst; we would ponder, Is this place really paying us for this? and How long will it continue?

Sad, but true, we all knew it was coming. The business model wasn’t sustainable, the vision was not sure, and the pennies ran out as the writers wrote like there was no tomorrow, about nearly every moment of their existence. It was like Facebook with people posting their breakfast, birthday parties, children playing, and dogs barking, yet we were making money for it — just imagine the excitement this caused.

I remember a few similar sites from back in that time; these didn’t blow up as big but did have their heyday. I’m thinking of Teckler, Daily Two Cents, RedGage, MyLot, and ChatAbout.

Now I did make money from Daily Two Cents ($30 or so), which is still online and around the 4 million Alexa world ranking range; I also made money on ChatAbout for a brief time (no longer around), yet made nothing with Teckler (gone with the wind) or RedGage. Daily Two Cents was more of a writing site rather than a social media site, but it never had the user-friendliness to get huge. I really liked Teckler but it was nearly dead by the time I got there (died soon after). RedGage is still online with an 8ook Alexa world ranking, but the functionality is slipping and I never made any money there. MyLot is still around and doing the best of all of them with a 40k Alexa world ranking, but I never made money from them and eventually couldn’t log in.

The recent iteration of this concept has manifested through blockchain technology, such as Minds, Bastyon, and SoMee to name a few. I’ve never made enough to cash out anything, but I do have accounts with these social media sites — SoMee is just starting after their beta test. While similar, they are not the same as Bubblews, as that model has been shown to go bust fairly quickly.

With all this said, we can be grateful for quality writing sites like Medium that allow us to socialize, yet write seriously and sincerely without simply craving for pennies. If there are any lessons to learn from the bubble bust, don't put all your eggs in one basket and this internet world is ever-changing.

Originally published at Medium Dec. 14, 2022

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When was the last time Oregon had a Republican governor?

              Will we ever see one again? Conservative-minded Oregonians might be curious to know the last time Oregon had a Republican governor. For those 37 years and younger, they might wonder if Oregon ever had a Republican governor considering the last year a Republican served in the office was the first 12 days of 1987. The last Republican governor for Oregon was Gov. Victor G. Atiyeh who served two terms from January 8, 1979 — January 12, 1987. Victor was born on February 20, 1923, which means he was 55 when he first became governor and 63 when he left. Victor passed away at the age of 91 years old on July 20, 2014. In all the years since he left as Oregon’s governor until he passed, he never saw another Republican governor serve his home state again. Even until now in 2024, we have yet to see any other political party besides the Democratic Party as the governor of Oregon — that means we’ve had a Democrat as governor for 37 years consecutively. Overall, since 1859, Oregon has h

You Don’t Get It

You don’t understand what’s going on. You are my people, I’m familiar with our shared culture and history, at least what’s left worth sharing. Still, I must say, the vast majority of you simply don’t get it, you don’t understand what is going on in the slightest. The measure of conditioning is well beyond the average person’s perception, and even those that catch on are mostly caught in a controlled wake-up zone full of lies and deceit, as though stuck in a hedge maze in the middle of nowhere with the “nothing” coming close like a hurricane of chaos. Will my fellow American caucasian people figure it out, what’s really going on? Will they search for the hidden history books and evidence that explains the alternative view of the establishment? I wonder. Some do, they are the remnant of believers, those who have searched for the truth out of a sincere love for it. They are honest and value the truth over lies, and they will not let anyone stop them from finding the truth and living truth

Where is Humanity Going?

Conversations Part 1 In the near future, a middle-aged man (Seth), from America, found himself talking with his mentor in a dystopian land full of deception. His mentor was a gray-headed and bearded man just past middle-aged called Pastor Nick. Seth had many questions for his mentor and the ongoing conversations are what ensued. What is the purpose and direction of humanity? Seth asked. Well, Seth, the obvious answer involves technology, as it is the main purpose of modern man. See, the so-called progress of humanity is culminating with a technological tyranny, giving the elite total control over everyone within the system, which is built and controlled by technology. Everyone involved in the system, as it is transitioning into this hive mind, is helping to build and support the reality of this technological future. They perceive it as progress, yet it is being built for only one reason — to control every human within the system. Is everyone going to be within the system? Seth asked. N

Are Trump and Biden acting in a political soap opera?

The days of our lives are getting interesting. Realizing politics has tangible results for regular citizens, questioning the authenticity of politics is relevant considering the holistic factors involved. For instance, wondering if the political frontrunners for key positions in the U.S. government are playing a part, acting a character that has been scripted in correlation with their sincere personality underneath. The implications are far-reaching if this is the case, yet isn’t the question relevant in our deep fake technological world? Considering that the divide between fantasy and reality has been clouded with deception and virtual reality, doesn’t it seem plausible in some measure to think that the U.S. presidential race is scripted to control the population according to a certain agenda? Is it naive to think the powers to be would allow the citizens to direct the government when they could get away with not doing so? Is it cynical to think otherwise or practical common sense? Es